It's spring around here:)
So I thought you'd like this article:
And here, any competent Bible student can see that the feministic stance
on the sexual and emotional obligations of spouses is exactly the
reverse of the case, if anything. The Bible, and the Christian tradition
as a consequence, clearly holds that sex (and the fruit that ordinarily
comes from it) is the primary, distinctive feature of marriage.
Marriage is designed to be the place where sex happens.
Marriage and sex are not the same thing, but the latter is a necessary
condition and the primary reason for the former. Marriage is meant to
channel the incredible power of human sexuality into a constructive
force- biologically, psychologically, and socially. When the heat of
sexuality is allowed to run outside of marriage, it is inevitably a
destructive fire. And of course, having a marriage without sex, is like
building a forge to do basket weaving. So it shouldn’t be controversial
to say that by design sex should be happening in marriage. Which means
spouses owe conjugal relations to each other. They are in fact entitled to sex with their mate.
For all the women out there who apparently hate the very idea of having s8xual relationship with their (prospective) husbands: why don't you go join the nunnery? Seriously though, depriving your spouse is a just cause for divorce. When we abolish no-fault divorce, it'll be one of the divorce grounds again.
Hat tip to Will from Patriactionary